As an Amazon affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
In this blog post, I’ll give you the lowdown on all the differences between the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 universal remotes.
Is Sofabaton U2 Worth the Upgrade?I have done some pretty extensive testing of the Sofabaton U1 remote this year. When I learned that the company decided to upgrade the U1 to address some of the remote’s shortcomings, I was excited.
While the remote isn’t perfect or as nice as the higher-end X1 model, I’m here to tell you that I’m impressed.
To give you a quick answer:
The U2 remote control outperforms the U1 with its refined design, larger buttons, satisfying click, and user-friendly, removable battery cover. Enhanced infrared range and off-axis functionality, combined with overall improvements in usability, aesthetics, and performance, make the U2 remote an undeniably superior choice over its predecessor.
In the following sections, I’ll delve deeper into the finer details of the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 models, comparing their design, functionality, and overall performance.
Let’s start with a side-by-side comparison table.
Sofabaton U1 vs U2: Tech Specs Comparison
The following table provides a side-by-side features comparison of the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 remotes.
Last update on 09/27/2023 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
Sofabaton U1 Mini Review
The Sofabaton U1 is a versatile and affordable universal remote that offers a good blend of functionality and ease of use. Its compatibility with a wide range of devices, including TVs, soundbars, and streaming devices, makes it a reliable choice for users looking to consolidate their remotes.
While the U1 has its strengths, the recently released Sofabaton U2 has addressed shortcomings and outshines the U1 in certain areas. The U1 remains a viable option for those who want a budget-friendly remote with a solid feature set.
Where to Buy
Here is a popular video review of the Sofabaton U1 from Hit84854’s YouTube channel.Video Credit: Hit8454
Sofabaton U2 Mini Review
The Sofabaton U2 builds upon the strengths of its predecessor, the U1, by addressing its shortcomings and enhancing its overall design and performance. The U2 remote is an excellent choice for users looking for a more refined and user-friendly universal remote experience, thanks to its sleek design, improved button layout, and extended infrared range.
The U2 model outshines the U1 in various aspects, making it a worthy upgrade for those who seek a more efficient and enjoyable universal remote experience. With its solid feature set and improved design, the Sofabaton U2 is undoubtedly a strong contender in the universal remote market.
Where to Buy
Here is a video review of the U2 remote from Kspaceguy.Video Credit: Kpaceguy
📚Related: Sofabaton vs Logitech Harmony
Sofabaton U1 vs U2 FAQs
Question 1: What are the main differences between the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 remotes?
Answer: In comparing Sofabaton U1 vs U2, the U2 offers a sleeker design with smoother edges, larger numbered buttons, and more responsive buttons with a satisfying click. It also has improved infrared performance with better range and off-axis functionality, making it an overall better remote than the U1. One of the biggest gripes about the u1 is that the battery compartment is hard to access; Sofabaton fixed this with the U2, which has a much easier-to-remove battery cover.
Question 2: Can I use the Sofabaton U1 and U2 remotes with all my devices?
Answer: The Sofabaton U1 vs U2 remotes are designed to control a wide range of devices, including TVs, soundbars, streaming devices, and some smart home devices. However, it’s important to check the compatibility list on the manufacturer’s website to ensure that your specific devices are supported.
Question 3: What is the battery life of the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 remotes?
Answer: The U1 and U2 remotes require 2 AA batteries, which are included in the package. The battery life of both remotes can vary depending on usage, but generally, they can last for 3-6 months with regular use. It’s recommended to use high-quality alkaline batteries for optimal battery life.
Question 4: Is the setup process difficult for the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 remotes?
The Sofabaton U1 and U2 remotes are set up using the Sofabaton app, which can be downloaded from the App Store or Google Play. The app requires the model numbers of all the devices you want to control, which you must manually enter.
While the app automatically detects some popular streaming devices like Amazon Fire TV and Apple TV, others may require manual setup. The app provides step-by-step guidance for setting up the remote, including how to program one-touch macros, customize button assignments, and troubleshoot any issues that may arise.
If you are struggling with the setup process, several resources are available online, including YouTube videos and forums where users share tips and advice. While the setup process can initially be tricky, the Sofabaton app provides a comprehensive and user-friendly guide to help you get the most out of your universal remote.
Sofabaton U1 vs U2: The Verdict
After extensive testing of the Sofabaton U1 vs U2 universal remotes, it’s clear that the U2 is the better choice for most users. While the U1 has its strengths, including its compact size and affordable price point, the U2 offers significant upgrades in design, button feel, and infrared performance. These improvements and the easier-to-open battery compartment make the U2 a more efficient and enjoyable universal remote experience.
If the price is a major concern, U1 is still a viable option. However, for users looking for the best universal remote experience, U2 is the way to go. If budget isn’t an issue, the higher-end Sofabaton X1 model offers even more advanced features and premium build quality.
📚Up Next: Sofabaton X1 vs U1: Remote Smackdown!
Tim Brennan is a technology blogger and hosts the @TecTimmy YouTube channel. He writes about smart homes at oneSmartcrib, home theaters at UniversalRemoteReviews, and AI in writing at Writeinteractive. A graduate of Northeastern University School of Journalism, he has written about technology for 30 years. Tim lives on the ocean in Nahant, Massachusetts.
Please subscribe to my YouTube channel for a fun take on all things tech.